Bridge Financing for Education in Northern Samar
These tables analyze the project's success using KPA tools. You can also view the executive summary of the project.
Capital/Assets and Vulnerabilities Before the Project
|
- + Access rights – Right of the poor to quality
education;
- + RA 6728 Education Service Contracting, a law
subsidizing poor
students to study in private schools;
- + SHIFT nuns and volunteers are known, accepted and
respected in the
communities, schools, marketplaces in Mondragon and Catarman;
- + SHIFT’s credibility and ability to mobilize local,
national and
international volunteers (ex. German volunteer nurse, Jesuit Volunteers
and youth volunteers);
- + High goodwill of SHIFT allowing it to secure favors
and obtain
benefits from different individuals and groups.
- + RSCJ Congregation’s national and international
network of support;
- + SAA owned by the Roman Catholic Diocese of
Catarman;
- + PEF interested to support the project, Northern
Samar being the
number one PEF priority province
|
- - SHIFT involved in many
programs mostly supported by volunteers; tendency to spread itself too
thinly;
- - SHIFT lacked policies, procedures and systems;
- - Absence of formal MOA between SHIFT and other
project partners like
the University of Eastern Philippines for the agricultural technology
assistance and the Municipal LGU for their “tractor” counterpart;
- - Nominal involvement of the Diocese in SAA affairs.
|
- + Regular subsidy from DepEd under the ESC contract;
- + Some tuition fees collected.
|
- - Economically poor
majority: cannot afford private school’s tuition fees, transportation
and other incidental costs of schooling; high (15%) dropout
rate;
- - ESC subsidy remittance always months late;
- - Teachers not paid in full or on time, had to borrow
from loan sharks
or rediscount their salary slips
|
- + Presence of loosely organized communities assisted
by
SHIFT in other programs
|
- - Community
organizations are weak, lack leaders, not so positive previous
experiences in group processes
|
- + Poor students and their parents value and aspire
for
quality education;
- + Dedicated SAA teachers as proven by their
willingness to work despite
irregular pay in the past;
- + Deeply committed educators: two RSCJ sisters who
teach not only as an
exercise of profession but as a vocation;
- + Many successful SAA alumni within and outside the
community;
- + Presence of agriculturists from the University of
Eastern Philippines
College of Agriculture
- + Resourceful SHIFT Executive Director.
|
- - Communities assisted
by SHIFT lack capable leaders and members;
- - SAA teachers preoccupied with making ends meet,
demoralized and not
very focused on the task of teaching.
|
- + Good relations between SAA administration /
teachers
and the community
|
- - Superstitious, even
some SAA teachers and non-teaching staff believe in superstitious
practices;
- - Absence of bayanihan or community spirit
in farms and
communities
|
- + SAA has an old school building;
- + SHIFT has an old dilapidated jeep that can be
repaired;
- + SHIFT has a 2,000 square meter farm land that can
be made productive;
- + Existence of a good national highway and bridges.
|
- - School buildings,
houses and farms vulnerable to natural disasters;
- - No regular public utility service (jeep or
tricycle) that could bring
students from the different barangays to school.
|
Interplay of Capital During Project Implementation
- Presence of loosely
organized communities assisted by other SHIFT programs, used to contact
potential livelihood self-help groups;
|
- Good relations in
Mondragon utilized in campaigning for enrollment in schools and
communities;
- Good relations with neighboring
communities utilized to identify farmers willing to work on SHIFT farm;
- Good relations with people and
communities tapped to invite potential disaster volunteers during
disaster preparedness training;
|
- Aspiration of students
and their parents for them to study in a private Catholic school;
- Teachers’ dedication to their
profession;
- Technical skills of UEP College of
Agriculture teachers initially tapped during the eco-farm planning;
|
- Aspiration of students
and their parents for them to study in a private Catholic school;
- Teachers’ dedication to their
profession;
- Technical skills of UEP College of
Agriculture teachers initially tapped during the eco-farm planning;
|
- PEF grant used to
implement project
|
- Tendency of SHIFT to spread itself too
thinly in many projects, too many activities;
- Inadequate SHIFT policies, procedures and systems;
|
- Lacking skills in business planning, CO
supervision;
- the Executive Director took a one-year Sabbatical
leave in
2006;
|
Creation of
bridge fund (financial
capital)
- Enabled the poor to gain access to quality education:
(stakeholder
and human capital)
- Unburdened the SAA administration from the worry, and
the
wastage of time and energy in trying to borrow funds to run the school
while waiting for the ESC subsidy (human
capital)
Repair and use of student vehicle (physical
capital)
- Provided transportation to students who live far from
the
school (infrastructure) and
contributed to an increase in enrolment and a decrease in dropout rate (human capital)
Education program planning (structural
capital)
- Enabled the SAA to come up with a systematic plan for
improvement including the upgrading of teachers (human capital)
- Creation of bridge fund (financial
capital)
- Enabled the poor to gain access to quality education (stakeholder and human capital)
- Unburdened the SAA administration from the worry, and
the
wastage of time and energy in trying to borrow funds to run the school
while waiting for the ESC subsidy (human
capital)
Development of farm lot
(physical capital)
- Made farm lot productive (physical capital)
Organizing for livelihood projects
(structural capital)
- Members in the community organized and coached how to
operate livelihood project (structural
capital)
- Members earned extra income (financial capital)
Disaster preparedness training (human
capital)
- Mobilized community volunteers to respond to Typhoon
Milenyo (natural
vulnerability)
Program review and strategic planning (structural capital)
- Streamlined SHIFT’s many involvements and focused on
transformative
education in formal and non-formal services (structural capital)
|
Changes in Assets/Capital After the Project
- SAA quality education more accessible to the poor
|
- Education of P1M+ bridge fund set up to tide over
during delayed ESC subsidy remittance
- Revolving loan fund for livelihood projects
- Incomes of around 30 livelihood project members
augmented
- More tuition fees collection
|
- School Development Committee formed, alumni mobilized
- More community participation in the school’s special
projects
- Improved systems and procedures in SHIFT
- 4 self-help groups organized and functioning
|
- Enrollment increased: SY 2006-07 was 341, in SY
2007-08 was 373
- Dropout rate reduced to 6% in SY2006-07 from 15% in
previous year
- More disciplined and better educated students
- Higher morale among teachers, anxiety level reduced;
energies now
spent on improving curricula and developing activities
- Teachers’ skills upgraded through summer workshops
- Teachers’ way of teaching changed and
improved. This is
attributed to regular higher salary and benefits plus summer workshops
for teachers
- More extra-curricular activities in school
- Alumni support mobilized through Social Development
Council,
fundraising
|
- More community participation in the school’s special
projects
|
- Student service vehicle acquired
- Land cultivated and made productive
- Drainage system improved
- School facilities improved
|