- Existence
of NGOs willing
to assist the communities like FEDI, SPECS Foundation, and the Peace
and Equity Foundation (PEF);
- Prior
experience of FEDI in water project implementation;
- LGU is working with MBCNA
in facilitating the land tenurial issues;
- Presence of water
concessionaires: MWSI and Maynilad;
|
- Addressing the
legal blocks
- Seeking the
help of the LGU;
- Guaranteeing the project;
|
- Violation
of the law by illegally connecting
their water connections. Most
households, including that of the
MBCNA leader, get free water by
resorting to illegal water connections.
However, they were always on the lookout
lest they are caught and sued.
- Presence of a
syndicate (water vending operators) in the area that
would prevent them from project implementation
|
- Values formation
activities in the community;
- Dialogue with the water
vendors.
|
- PEF commitment to provide financing
for the project;
- FEDI Counterpart for
project management;
|
- Sought loan and grant from PEF;
- Community Counterpart
(MBCNA) in the application for water installation.
|
- The
members have no regular or
viable sources of income
to enable them to have a private water connection.
|
- Existence
of community organizations
that can serve as direct conduit of delivering the water project to the
poor householdsMBCNA in Mandaluyong and KPK in Pasay City.
|
- Strengthening and developing
organizational systems and procedures;
- Creation of water committee;
- Development of Financial
System;
|
- MBCNA AND KPK
did
not have any experience with water projects;
- The existing community
organizations were at their infancy stage. They still need to install
and develop their systems and policies, specifically for water services
delivery.
|
- MBCNA had thirty
members and KPK had forty
members, who
can be mobilized for the project;
- Existing
community leadership:
- The MBCNA leader
was a charismatic person;
- The KPK leaders have some experience in
managing projects like the
education
of their children and their livelihood;
- Technical
Expertise within
and outside the community can be tapped to deal with the technical
requirements of the project.
|
- Development of human
capital
through training and community facilitation focusing on:
- Skills development;
- Leadership development;
- Leadership decentralization.
|
- Sanitation
and hygiene were
compromised due to lack of water.
- Loss
of productive
and personal
time.
|
- Dedication
to community service
of the organizations;
- Willingness
to implement and social acceptance
of a water project by the community;
- Openness
to providing counterpart inthe
project in the form of labor and financial contributions,
as well as paying for the water services.
- The expressed need of the
community to implement a water project;
- Expressed intention to
abandon their illegal water connections and embrace the legal framework
for the sake of the project;
- "Palabra de Honor" or credibility
that they can pay the loan for the water project.
|
- Tapping and developing
social
and cultural
capital
through:
- Community
mobilization;
- Maximizing smooth
interpersonal
relationship.
|
- Dependence
on Water Vendors.
They buy water from private
water vendors and private households who took
advantage of the poor by their unreasonable water pricing;
- Culture of "panlalamang" or
taking advantage among the members of the community to be able to
survive;
|
- Existing distribution technologies
as well as the improvement in the water structure efficiency and
maintenance by the Manila Water Company and Maynilad.
|
Accessing
appropriate water system
technologies.
|
- There was no available public faucet in
the community.
|